By Yun Fu
This publication presents a view of low-rank and sparse computing, in particular approximation, restoration, illustration, scaling, coding, embedding and studying between unconstrained visible facts. The booklet contains chapters masking a number of rising subject matters during this new box. It hyperlinks a number of well known examine fields in Human-Centered Computing, Social Media, photograph type, development acceptance, machine imaginative and prescient, sizeable facts, and Human-Computer interplay. comprises an outline of the low-rank and sparse modeling suggestions for visible research by means of interpreting either theoretical research and real-world applications.
Read Online or Download Low-Rank and Sparse Modeling for Visual Analysis PDF
Best analysis books
Analysis of Reliability and Quality Control: Fracture Mechanics 1
This primary e-book of a 3-volume set on Fracture Mechanics is especially founded at the massive diversity of the legislation of statistical distributions encountered in numerous clinical and technical fields. those legislation are essential in figuring out the chance habit of parts and mechanical buildings which are exploited within the different volumes of this sequence, that are devoted to reliability and qc.
- Formal Concept Analysis: Foundations and Applications
- Analyse 1
- Tensor analysis
- Interpolation de fractions continues et irrationalite de certaines constantes
Additional info for Low-Rank and Sparse Modeling for Visual Analysis
Example text
So the strengths of L and Z in (5) are balanced naturally. ∗ = Latent Low-Rank Representation (a) 29 (b) (c) Fig. 1 Illustrating the recovery of the hidden effects. a The block-diagonal affinity matrix identified by Z ∗O|H , which is obtained by solving problem (2). b The affinity matrix produced by LRR. Since the data sampling is insufficient, Z = I is the only feasible solution to problem (1). t. X = XZ + LX + E, 1, (6) where λ > 0 is a parameter and · 1 is the 1 -norm chosen for characterizing sparse noise.
T. X = L X, whose minimizer is assumed to be Z ∗Z , and min L L whose minimizer is assumed to be L ∗L . 3 of [3], it can be concluded that Z ∗Z rank (X ) = rank(X T ) = L ∗L ∗ . So the strengths of L and Z in (5) are balanced naturally. ∗ = Latent Low-Rank Representation (a) 29 (b) (c) Fig. 1 Illustrating the recovery of the hidden effects. a The block-diagonal affinity matrix identified by Z ∗O|H , which is obtained by solving problem (2). b The affinity matrix produced by LRR. Since the data sampling is insufficient, Z = I is the only feasible solution to problem (1).
1 More generally, NNROPs are expressed as min X X ∗ + λf (x), where f (x) is a convex function. In this work, we are particularly interested in the form (1), which has covered a wide range of problems. Scalable Low-Rank Representation 41 Usually, the high computational complexity of ALM (or APG) is caused by the computation of singular value thresholding (SVT) [4], which involves the singular value decomposition (SVD) of a matrix. For efficiency, Cai et al. [3] have established the so called fast-SVT, which is to compute SVT without SVD.