Show description

For example, Ford, the R&D head with vested interests and a difficult personality, prevents people from having candid conversations when they are most needed – during times of crisis. Rifkin needs to buckle down and make it clear to Ford and everyone else that they will be held accountable for their actions and their results and that no one gets to steamroll others. Without this rule, the company can only react after the horse has left the stable. To ensure better decision making, Rifkin should work hard to create a culture that rewards on the basis of unit performance as well as individual contributions.

Cal needs of managers. com, relates. Over the next decades, managers in many industries applied the technology to decisions about investments, pricing, advertising, and logistics, among other functions. But while technology was improving operational decisions, it was still largely a cart horse for hauling rather than a stallion for riding into battle. Then in 1979, John Rockart published the HBR article “Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs,” proposing that systems used by corporate leaders ought to give them data about the key jobs the company must 1950s 1951 Research conducted at the Carnegie Institute of Technology and MIT will lead to the development of early computer-based decision support tools.

Though animals’ reward and aversion circuitry is a lot like ours, unlike most animals, we can look out at the horizon and contemplate what might flow from a decision to chase immediate gratification. And we can get immediate pleasure from the prospect of some future gratification. Thrill of the Hunt Jean-Paul Sartre was a famous womanizer, but for him the excitement was in the chase. ”Sartre’s pursuits underscore a fundamental fact about how our brains experience rewards. Whether it’s reacting to a sexual conquest, a risky business deal, or an addictive drug, the brain often distinguishes clearly between the thrill of the hunt and the pleasure of the feast.