By Eben Alexander
A SCIENTIST’S CASE FOR THE AFTERLIFE
Thousands of individuals have had near-death studies, yet scientists have argued that they're very unlikely. Dr. Eben Alexander was once a type of scientists. A hugely expert neurosurgeon, Alexander knew that NDEs believe actual, yet are easily fantasies produced through brains below severe rigidity.
Then, Dr. Alexander’s personal mind used to be attacked by means of a unprecedented disorder. The a part of the mind that controls suggestion and emotion—and in essence makes us human—shut down thoroughly. For seven days he lay in a coma. Then, as his medical professionals thought of preventing remedy, Alexander’s eyes popped open. He had come again.
Alexander’s restoration is a scientific miracle. however the genuine miracle of his tale lies somewhere else. whereas his physique lay in coma, Alexander journeyed past this global and encountered an angelic being who guided him into the private geographical regions of super-physical lifestyles. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine resource of the universe itself.
Alexander’s tale isn't a delusion. sooner than he underwent his trip, he couldn't reconcile his wisdom of neuroscience with any trust in heaven, God, or the soul. at the present time Alexander is a physician who believes that real health and wellbeing could be completed in simple terms once we discover that God and the soul are genuine and that dying isn't the finish of non-public lifestyles yet just a transition.
This tale will be notable regardless of who it occurred to. That it occurred to Dr. Alexander makes it innovative. No scientist or individual of religion might be in a position to forget about it. studying it is going to swap your existence.
Read or Download Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife PDF
Similar theology books
How can the physique and Blood of Christ, with out ever leaving heaven, end up quite current on eucharistic altars the place the bread and wine nonetheless appear to be? 13th and fourteenth century Christian Aristotelians inspiration the reply needed to be "transubstantiation. "
Acclaimed thinker, Marilyn McCord Adams, investigates those later medieval theories of the Eucharist, focusing on the writings of Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham, with a few connection with Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor, and Bonaventure. She examines how their efforts to formulate and combine this theological datum provoked them to make major revisions in Aristotelian philosophical theories in regards to the metaphysical constitution and placement of our bodies, modifications among substance and injuries, causality and causal powers, and primary kinds of swap. atmosphere those advancements within the theological context that gave upward push to the query attracts cognizance to their understandings of the sacraments and their objective, in addition to to their understandings of the character and future of human beings.
Adams concludes that their philosophical transformations have been in most cases no longer advert hoc, yet systematic revisions that made room for transubstantiation whereas permitting Aristotle nonetheless to explain what ordinarily and of course occurs.
Born in Saxony in 1096, Hugh turned an Augustinian monk and in 1115 moved to the monastery of Saint Victor, Paris, the place he spent the rest of his existence, finally turning into the top of the varsity there. His writings conceal the full variety of arts and sacred technological know-how taught in his day. Paul Rorem bargains a simple creation to Hugh's theology, via a entire survey of his works.
The Turnings of Darkness and Light: Essays in Philosophical and Systematic Theology
This choice of essays, written among 1975 and 1987, covers issues together with the doctrine of analogy, the Trinity, theological realism, the problims of evil and affliction, ecclesiology, and the so-called theistic proofs. the sooner writings relect the author's education as a thinker within the Anglo-Aamerican analytic culture.
- Parting Ways: Jewishness and the Critique of Zionism (New Directions in Critical Theory)
- Truthful Action: Explorations in Practical Theology
- Covenant: God's Plan for Israel in the Last Days
- The Evolution of a Creationist: A Layman's Guide to the Conflict Between the Bible and Evolutionary Theory
- The Angel in Annunciation and Synchronicity: Knowledge and Belief in C.G. Jung
- Partaking in Divine Nature: Deification and Communion
Additional info for Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife
Example text
34. 22 Mansi 13, 280D. See also 328C, where “he who dares to make an icon or venerate it” is described as “an enemy of the doctrines of the Fathers and an opponent of the commandments of God”. Cf. Theodore of Studius, Antir. II, PG 99, 381B. ”25 The diplomatic manner in which the above passage is couched sheds light on the Achilles’ heel of the iconoclasts. Obliged by their opponents to range themselves against the Jewish tradition, they censure it on the one hand on points which are irrelevant to the question at issue and regard Hellenism on the other as the chief cause of every iconographical tradition.
Consequently, their presence at the council was not strictly in order. There is no doubt, however, that the Churches of the East were in favour of the icons and consequently their viewpoint was correctly represented. 76 Moreover, there was a significant number 74 On the role of the army in iconoclasm, see W. Kaegi, “The Byzantine Armies and Iconoclasm”, Byzantinoslavica 27 (1966) pp. 48–70, and the same author’s “The Byzantine Thematic Armies in the First Iconoclastic Period (728–787)”, in his Byzantine Military Unrest, Amsterdam 1981, pp.
A. Lipsius – M. Bonnet, Acta Apostolica Apocrypha, Leipzig 1891–1903, vol. ii, p. 165,27. 19 In the first fragment Eusebius wonders with surprise which icon she means, the true and immutable icon of Christ as Logos or the icon which he assumed when he became incarnate for our sake, that is to say, the form of the Servant. The former, the “form of God”, is clearly inaccessible to man, since “only the Father who begot him” knows the Son. The form of the Servant, on the other hand, which Christ assumed through his incarnation, we know after his resurrection “to have been mingled with the glory of his divinity, and that the mortal has been swallowed up by life”.