By John C. Lennox
'The Grand Design', by means of eminent scientist Stephen Hawking, is the most recent blockbusting contribution to the so-called New Atheist debate, and claims that the legislation of physics themselves introduced the Universe into being, instead of God. during this fast and forthright answer, John Lennox, Oxford mathematician and writer of 'God's Undertaker', exposes the failings in Hawking's common sense. In full of life, layman's phrases, Lennox courses us in the course of the key issues in Hawking's arguments - with transparent reasons of the most recent clinical and philosophical tools and theories - and demonstrates that faraway from disproving a author God, they make his life appear the entire extra possible.
Read or Download God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway? PDF
Best theology books
How can the physique and Blood of Christ, with out ever leaving heaven, emerge as relatively current on eucharistic altars the place the bread and wine nonetheless appear to be? 13th and fourteenth century Christian Aristotelians concept the reply needed to be "transubstantiation. "
Acclaimed thinker, Marilyn McCord Adams, investigates those later medieval theories of the Eucharist, targeting the writings of Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham, with a few connection with Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor, and Bonaventure. She examines how their efforts to formulate and combine this theological datum provoked them to make major revisions in Aristotelian philosophical theories concerning the metaphysical constitution and placement of our bodies, alterations among substance and injuries, causality and causal powers, and basic different types of swap. environment those advancements within the theological context that gave upward thrust to the query attracts awareness to their understandings of the sacraments and their goal, in addition to to their understandings of the character and future of human beings.
Adams concludes that their philosophical ameliorations have been in general now not advert hoc, yet systematic revisions that made room for transubstantiation whereas permitting Aristotle nonetheless to explain what usually and of course occurs.
Born in Saxony in 1096, Hugh turned an Augustinian monk and in 1115 moved to the monastery of Saint Victor, Paris, the place he spent the rest of his lifestyles, ultimately changing into the top of the college there. His writings disguise the total diversity of arts and sacred technological know-how taught in his day. Paul Rorem bargains a easy advent to Hugh's theology, via a entire survey of his works.
This number of essays, written among 1975 and 1987, covers themes together with the doctrine of analogy, the Trinity, theological realism, the problims of evil and discomfort, ecclesiology, and the so-called theistic proofs. the sooner writings relect the author's education as a thinker within the Anglo-Aamerican analytic culture.
- Jesus is Dead
- The Dionysian Mystical Theology
- The Sovereignty of Joy: Nietzsche's Vision of Grand Politics (Toronto Studies in Philosophy)
- Truthful Action: Explorations in Practical Theology
- The Analogy of Faith: The Quest for God's Speakability (Strategic Initiatives in Evangelical Theology)
Additional resources for God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway?
C. S. Lewis grasped this issue, with characteristic clarity. Of the laws of nature he writes: They produce no events: they state the pattern to which every event – if only it can be induced to happen – must conform, just as the rules of arithmetic state the pattern to which all transactions with money must conform – if only you can get hold of any money. Thus in one sense the laws of Nature cover the whole field of space and time; in another, what they leave out is precisely the whole real universe – the incessant torrent of actual events which makes up true history.
Dismissing such an agent, Hawking ascribes creative power to physical law; but physical law is not an agent. Hawking is making a classic category mistake by confusing two entirely different kinds of entity: physical law and personal agency. The choice he sets before us is between false alternatives. He has confused two levels of explanation: agency and law. God is an explanation of the universe, but not the same type of explanation as that which is given by physics. Suppose, to make matters clearer, we replace the universe by a jet engine and then are asked to explain it.
Could all of this be just a little too “much ado about nothing”? The situation does not improve when we move on to the logic of the second part of Hawking’s statement: “the universe can and will create itself from nothing”. This assertion is self-contradictory. If we say “X creates Y”, we presuppose the existence of X in the first place in order to bring Y into existence. That is a simple matter of understanding what the words “X creates Y” mean. If, therefore, we say “X creates X”, we imply that we are presupposing the existence of X in order to account for the existence of X.