By Raymond F. Person
Individual concludes that the Deuteronomic school's redactional job persisted into the postexilic interval. partly I, he first reviews the commonly-held end that the Deuteronomic university ceased within the Exile. He then provides facts that implies that the Deuteronomic redactions of the Deuteronomic historical past and Jeremiah endured into the postexilic interval. this facts is of 2 forms: (1) Deuteronomic phrasing within the postexilic additions present in the MT and (2) the topics of go back and restoratin as vaticinia ex eventu. partially II, the belief that the Detueronomic tuition persisted within the postexilic interval is strengthened with extra proof within the kind of Deuteronomic phrasing within the redactional fabric of moment Zechariah. adapting the technique utilized by means of J Philip Hyatt and others to Jeremiah, individual argues that Zechariah used to be redacted via the Deuteronomic institution with the addition of the Deuteronomic prose in Zechariah 9-14. partially III, individual reviews at the attainable social surroundings of the Deuteronomic tuition in postexilic Yehud in addition to its theology during this atmosphere.
Read or Download Second Zechariah & the Deuteronomic School (JSOT Supplement) PDF
Best old testament books
Ecclesiastes (Interpretation, a Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching)
"Ecclesiastes" is a set of sayings through Qoheleth (meaning "preacher" or "teacher"), who has launched into a trip to find the aim of human lifestyles. This observation offers an interpretation of this vintage textual content.
Genesis: Interpretation : A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching
Every one biblical publication is gifted for its prime use through instructor or preacher, taking into consideratoin its centra function, its use within the liturgical and confessional culture and in lectionaries, and its particular value for Christian ethics and theology.
The Promise of the Land as Oath: A Key to the Formation of the Pentateuch
During this examine, Suzanne Boorer offers a way of comparing many of the present and conflicting paradigms for the formation of the Pentateuch, by way of reading chosen texts in Genesis to Numbers that categorical Yahweh's oath of the land to the ancestors, with the intention to verify their relative degrees relating to their surrounding contexts, when it comes to one another, and in terms of their parallels in Deuteronomy.
There were many legends and traditions in regards to the ten misplaced tribes of the Northern nation of Israel. This publication attracts upon wide discoveries and data released in regards to the circulate of the folks of Israel and Judah from Davidic instances to the sunrise of the Hellenistic interval. the writer has validated the biblical documents opposed to archaeological proof, testimony and inscriptions present in Syria, Assyria, Babylon and Persia.
- Justice in Time
- The ''Belly-Myther'' of Endor: Interpretations of 1 Kingdoms 28 in the Early Church (Writings from the Greco-Roman World)
- Genesis: Beginning and Blessing (Preaching the Word) (Preaching the Word)
- Daughter Zion: Her Portrait, Her Response
- The authenticity of faith in Kierkegaard's philosophy
- Belly and Body in the Pauline Epistles (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series)
Extra info for Second Zechariah & the Deuteronomic School (JSOT Supplement)
Example text
33 against MT, Rote" concluded that MT-Deut. 33, 36, 21b, 23 are additions from a Deuteronomic redactor using both a D source and a P source. 19. 'Joshua 20', p. 145. See also A. Rofe, 'The History of the Cities of Refuge in Biblical Law', in Studies in Bible (ScrHier, 31; ed. S. Japhet; Jerusalem: Magnes, 1986), pp. 205-39. Here Rofe compared Exod. 13; Num. 9-34; Deut. 41-43; Deut. 1-13; and Josh. 20. From this comparison, he concluded that the second stage of the development of the cities of refuge, represented in Num.
43 Closely related to this use 34. Rof£, 'Joshua 20', p. 137-39. The translation is Rofg's. See also Tov, 'Growth of the Book of Joshua', p. 335. 35. Tov, 'Growth of the Book of Joshua', p. 336. The translation is TOY'S. 36. Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School, p. 336. 37. Tov, 'Growth of the Book of Joshua', p. 336. The translation is Tov's. 38. Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School, p. 342. 39. Tov, 'Growth of the Book of Joshua', p. 336. The translation is Tov's. 40.
35, 133, 299). Also, his terminology for the group to which II Zech belonged varies: 'tradition', 'traditio-circle', 'group', 'school' and 'circle'. Such inconsistency may suggest that Mason understands the individual responsible for II Zech as a prophet who belonged to a Zecharianic school of prophets (see especially 'Relation of Zech 9-14 to Proto-Zechariah', p. 238; 'Use of Earlier Biblical Material in Zechariah 9-14', p. 133). 36 Second Zechariah and the Deuteronomic School II Zech. 99 In other words, in this analogy he used the relationship between the historical Jeremiah and the Deuteronomic prose in Jer to describe the relationship between I Zech and II Zech.